Texas
LBB-01
- Total IT load
- 170 MW
- Scope
- MEP and structural design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Evidence over theatre
Projects
A transparent method for turning demanding briefs into coordinated, verifiable outcomes.
Selected project portfolio
Designed for mission-critical scale.
Eight data center programmes across North America, Europe and Central Asia, presented as a concise portfolio rather than separate project pages.
Texas
MAF-01
- Total IT load
- 240 MW
- Scope
- MEP and structural design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Toronto
YYZ-01
- Total IT load
- 240 MW
- Scope
- MEP design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Armenia
EVN-01
- Total IT load
- 11 MW
- Scope
- MEP design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Armenia
EVN-02
- Total IT load
- 280 MW
- Scope
- MEP, structural and civil infrastructure design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Kazakhstan
KZH-01
- Total IT load
- 140 MW
- Scope
- MEP, structural and civil infrastructure design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Philadelphia
PHL-01
- Total IT load
- 160 MW
- Scope
- MEP design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Ohio
HYD-01
- Total IT load
- 60 MW
- Scope
- MEP design, shop drawings and construction administration.
Project evidence, not project theatre
See the control trail behind the portfolio.
KDC’s project approach keeps technical intent, multidisciplinary interfaces, shop-drawing coordination, field observations and construction-administration evidence connected from design through delivery.
Open the evidence cockpit ↓One route from decision to accepted evidence.
The cockpit keeps the four project signals visible together. A change in one surface must remain legible to every affected owner.
Decision gate
The decision, governing basis, approver and downstream consequence remain visible.
Interface ownership
Each multidisciplinary boundary has a named owner, response route and closure condition.
Field observation
Installed conditions retain technical context, disposition and verification evidence.
Readiness record
Tests, exceptions, retests and acceptance form one traceable handover route.
Control sequence
The project moves. The evidence stays attached.
Each stage inherits the decisions and unresolved conditions of the stage before it. The route is designed to prevent handoffs from erasing context.
- 01Frame
Define the outcome
Set the decision boundary, assumptions, interfaces and acceptance basis.
- 02Coordinate
Resolve the system
Connect disciplines, suppliers and owners around reviewable technical intent.
- 03Observe
Test the field
Compare installation and performance evidence with the approved requirement.
- 04Close
Release with clarity
Record disposition, remaining limitations and receiving-team ownership.
Project control register
What must remain reviewable.
A defensible project record makes the current state understandable without relying on private conversations or memory.
Explore delivery assurance ↗Decision basis
Requirement, assumptions, alternatives and approval.
Interface map
Affected disciplines, owners and response dates.
Change record
Reason, consequence, review and accepted disposition.
Field evidence
Observation, location, context and verification.
Exception route
Priority, owner, action, retest and closure.
Handover state
Accepted evidence, limitations and operational ownership.
Bring the live project condition